Friday, September 02, 2011


Mariano Rivera is the best reliever in baseball history, Dr. Michael Hoban

7/15/10, "Just How good is Mariano Rivera," by Michael Hoban,

Bill James’ Win Shares system is the most comprehensive tool available to understand how good a season a player had. It includes offensive and defensive contributions and adjusts for all relevant factors.

The CAWS Gauge is based on a player’s core value (his ten best seasons) plus additional credit for his other seasons. It is an objective tool which attempts to assess career value. But in attempting to measure the career value of a relief pitcher, of course, we encounter some special difficulties.

In trying to establish reasonable benchmarks for Hall of Fame numbers, I naturally came up against the question: Since a relief pitcher who has never been a starter will normally pitch many fewer innings than a starting pitcher,

In wrestling with this question, I looked at the careers of all the great relief pitchers to try to establish a benchmark that would recognize the best – but would not be “too easy.” And I believe that I have accomplished this task.

Consider the following statement. Through the 2009 season, there have only been five pitchers in the modern era (since 1920) who have achieved a CAWS score of 150 while pitching fewer than 1700 innings. Here are those pitchers. (I have included Rollie Fingers because he was so close to 1700.) IP is innings pitched, CWS is career win shares, CV is core value (the win shares for the ten best seasons) and CAWS is the CAWS score [CAWS = CV + .25(CWS – CV)].

Mariano Rivera 1090
227 175 188
Lee Smith 1289 198 152 164
Bruce Sutter 1042 168 163 164
Dan Quisenberry 1043 157 155 156
Rollie Fingers 1701 188 144 155

So, the CAWS Gauge has established the 1700/150 benchmark as the standard for “pure” relief pitchers to have HOF numbers. And, as you can see,

The Gauge suggests that these are the only pure relievers who have posted obvious HOF numbers during their careers – and all should be in the Hall.

Please note that some great relievers are not included here such as Hoyt Wilhelm, Dennis Eckersley and Goose Gossage. We must recognize that some relievers were starting pitchers for some part of their careers and cannot be judged by the same standard as a pure relief pitcher (those who were never starters). Each of these three outstanding relievers (Wilhelm, Eckersley and Gossage) pitched many more than 1700 innings during their careers. And so, the CAWS Gauge has established a different benchmark which shows that all three did indeed post Hall of Fame numbers during their careers.

Consider the numbers for the following outstanding relief pitchers at the end of 2009.

Billy Wagner
833 165 143 149
Trevor Hoffman 1042 187 135 148

As you can see, these two relievers are closing in on the CAWS benchmark of 150 but are not quite there yet. Trevor Hoffman, of course, is the major league “saves leader.” It looks like each of them may reach the benchmark in 2010.

Finally, in case you are wondering about some other pure relievers, here are the numbers for some of the best ever. Note that none of them achieved the 150 CAWS benchmark.

John Franco
1246 183 128 142
Mike Marshall
1387 146 139 141
Kent Tekulve
1436 159 135 141
John Hiller
1242 146 136 139
Sparky Lyle
1390 161 132 139
Tom Henke
790 140 130 133
Doug Jones
1121 146 128 133
Jeff Montgomery
869 134 127 129
John Wetteland
765 127 125 126

The CAWS Career Gauge attempts to tell us in a purely objective manner which players posted Hall of Fame numbers during their careers. And looking at the numbers above, you can see why I feel very comfortable in suggesting

"If anyone would like to get a free e-copy of Professor Hoban’s 100-page monograph: A HOF HANDBOOK: Who Belongs and Who Does Not, just drop a note to" (Mr. Hoban is a longtime member of SABR).


Commenter to Mr. Hoban's article said:

"Tom Stone says:

Yes indeed. And add to his CAWS score his almost unbelieveable postseason numbers, which are: 88 games, 70 GF, 133.1 IP, 8-1 record, 39 SV, 0.773 WHIP, 0.74 ERA. That is just insane."



Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?